Dokumentenserver der Freien Universität Berlin

Objekt-Metadaten

Procedural legitimacy and private transnational governance
Beisheim, Marianne ;  Dingwerth, Klaus ;  DFG Research Center (SFB) 700 Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood - New Modes of Governance?

Main titleProcedural legitimacy and private transnational governance
SubtitleAre the good ones doing better?
AuthorBeisheim, Marianne
AuthorDingwerth, Klaus
InstitutionDFG Research Center (SFB) 700 Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood - New Modes of Governance?
No. of Pages37 S.
Series SFB Governance working paper series / Englische Ausgabe ; 14
Classification (DDC)321 Systems of governments and states
Also published in
AbstractPrivate governance schemes deploy a significant share of their resources to advocate their legitimacy. Assuming that their primary concern is to ensure their own success, this suggests that the initiators of private governance schemes presume a strong relation between a scheme’s perception as legitimate on the one hand and its success on the other. Based on this observation, this article explores the general hypothesis that the procedural legitimacy of private governance schemes – defined in terms of inclusiveness, transparency, and deliberativeness – enhances their prospects for success. We particularly focus on how right process may translate into effectiveness. To this end, the article identifies three mechanisms: the development of ownership based on inclusive, fair and representative participation; social learning and persuasion based on deliberative procedures; and social control based on transparency and accountability. The three mechanisms are subjected to a plausibility probe in an illustrative case study of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), a private governance scheme in the field of corporate sustainability politics. All in all, the study shows how the GRI’s success can be related to procedural legitimacy. In particular, it suggests that while inclusiveness and
deliberation are mostly relevant to gain legitimacy, transparency and accountability are primarily relevant to maintain the legitimacy of private transnational governance schemes.
Documents
PDF-Datei
If your browser can't open the file, please download the file first and then open it
 
FU DepartmentDepartment of Political and Social Sciences
Other affiliation(s)Sonderforschungsbereich Governance in Räumen begrenzter Staatlichkeit - Neue Formen des Regierens?
Year of publication2008
Type of documentOther article
LanguageEnglish
Terms of use/Rights Nutzungsbedingungen
Created at2008-06-19 : 09:03:45
Last changed2014-01-23 : 04:20:42
 
Static URLhttp://edocs.fu-berlin.de/docs/receive/FUDOCS_document_000000000337
Statistics
 

LOADING...